New Twist in AZ Audit – Dominion Now Refusing to Comply

What a shocker

Well, it looks like Dominion is back to its old tricks and is quickly trying to pull the wool over our eyes yet again.

There’s still a fair amount of questions looming over the 2020 election, which as we all know will go down in history as one of the most controversial yet, and once more, Dominion is sitting smack dab in the middle of it all.

But this time, Dominion is fighting very hard to keep things under wraps with the Arizona audit that’s underway — they are now refusing to cooperate at all with the investigation.

The controversial group is apparently refusing to hand over any of their passwords in order to investigate serious concerns over missing data, which they claim is an “irresponsible act.”

From Western Journal

So why are they now refusing to hand over passwords that would aid scrutiny into serious concerns have been raised over missing data? At the very least, this is simply not a great look for the much-criticized firm.

In a statement blasting one of the firms conducting the forensic audit, Dominion explained why they would not be participating in what they derided as an “irresponsible act.”

“Dominion voluntarily provides access to voting machine equipment and information to auditors who have been accredited by the U.S. Election Assistance Commission. We happily did so with the independent EAC-accredited providers that Maricopa County hired for system auditing earlier this year,” the firm wrote in a statement obtained by 12 News reporter Brahm Resnik on Thursday.

“Releasing Dominion’s intellectual property to an unaccredited, biased, and plainly unreliable actor such as Cyber Ninjas would be reckless, causing irreparable damage to the commercial interests of the company and the election security interests of the country,” the statement read.

“No company should be compelled to participate in such an irresponsible act,” the firm concluded.

This certainly seems fishy.

Why was Dominion so quick to hand over their info to campaign officials, but an independent firm is “dangerous?”

Makes absolutely no sense.